Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of content and non-congruence regarding property rights.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible for lack of content and failure to demonstrate a violation of constitutional rights. The applicant, Vilamuiños Limitada, challenged a property restitution judgment but failed to establish a direct link between the contested decision and the alleged constitutional breach. The court ruled that the petition did not meet the strict requirements of congruence and substantive merit necessary for admissibility.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 CE; Art. 137 CE: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal for lack of content when the applicant fails to demonstrate a direct causal link between the contested administrative or judicial act and the alleged violation of constitutional rights, thereby failing the principle of congruence.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 460-1995
Fecha de resolución
19/06/1995
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 460/1995
Resumen
Inadmisión. Principio de congruencia: no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
«Vilamuiños Limitada» contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, recaída en apelación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 16 de la capital en autos de juicio de retracto.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00185-1995_00460.pdf