Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 128/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:128A AI generated

Spanish Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of constitutional relevance and ineffective judicial remedy. The court rejects the claim regarding the right to a fair trial and legal certainty. The decision upholds the finality of the criminal judgment. The court finds no constitutional violation in the procedural history. The appeal is inadmissible for lack of merit. The ruling emphasizes the principle of legal certainty. The court concludes the case is settled by prior judgments.

Case Number AUTO 128/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible for lack of constitutional relevance and ineffective judicial protection. The applicant argued that the final criminal judgment violated his right to a fair trial and legal certainty regarding the prescription of the penal action. The court rejected these claims, finding no constitutional defect in the proceedings or the finality of the judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 25.1 CE: The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to challenging final criminal judgments that have acquired res judicata, nor does it cover procedural acts lacking constitutional significance.

Keywords

AI generated
right to effective judicial protection res judicata in criminal law lack of constitutional relevance prescription of penal action finality of criminal judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 25.1 CE
art. 306 del Código Penal
3 de la misma ciudad, en procedimiento seguido por delito penado en el art. 306 del Código Penal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1952-1994

Fecha de resolución

08/05/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.952/1994.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Indefensión: sin relevancia constitucional. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: prescripción de la acción penal. Principio de legalidad penal: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido

constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antonio Pérez González contra Auto del Juzgado de lo Penal núm. 1 de Orense que declara firme la Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 3 de la misma ciudad, en procedimiento seguido por delito penado en el art. 306 del Código Penal.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00128-1994_01952.pdf