Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 29/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:29A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to legislative vacuum not infringing fundamental rights and lack of equality.

Case Number AUTO 29/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible, citing a legislative vacuum that did not infringe fundamental rights. The applicant argued for effective judicial protection and equality, but the court found the omission non-lesive. Consequently, the claim failed because the legislative gap did not violate constitutional principles.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 14 CE: A legislative vacuum is not a violation of the right to effective judicial protection or the principle of equality if it does not infringe fundamental rights.

Keywords

AI generated
legislative vacuum effective judicial protection principle of equality fundamental rights inadmissible appeal constitutional demand non-lesive omission

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 14 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2013-1994

Fecha de resolución

30/01/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.013/1994.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Vacío legislativo: omisión de regulación legal no lesiva de derechos fundamentales. Principio de igualdad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Eusebio Palacios Grijalvo contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo del T.S.J. de Madrid recaída en recurso contra resoluciones de la Dirección General de Relaciones con la Administración de Justicia relativa a reclamación

retributiva.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00029-1994_02013.pdf