Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 28/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:28A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to legislative gap not infringing fundamental rights and lack of equality among officials.

Case Number AUTO 28/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible, citing a legislative gap that did not infringe fundamental rights. The applicant argued for equal treatment regarding retributive claims, but the court found no violation of the principle of equality. Consequently, the effective protection of judges and tribunals was deemed satisfied without needing new legislation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 14 CE: A legislative gap does not constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection or the principle of equality if it does not affect the exercise of fundamental rights or create an unjustified distinction between officials.

Keywords

AI generated
legislative gap effective judicial protection principle of equality public officials retributive claims fundamental rights inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 14 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2012-1994

Fecha de resolución

30/01/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.012/1994.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Vacío legislativo: omisión de regulación legislativa no lesiva de derechos fundamentales. Principio de igualdad: funcionarios. Contenido constitucional de la

demanda: carencia.

Doña María José Romero Suárez contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo del Tribunal Superior de Madrid en recurso contra resolución de la Dirección General de Relaciones con la Administración de Justicia sobre reclamación retributiva.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00028-1994_02012.pdf