Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 27/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:27A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to legislative gap not infringing fundamental rights and lack of equality among officials.

Case Number AUTO 27/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible, citing a legislative vacuum that did not infringe fundamental rights. The applicant, a judicial official, challenged administrative decisions regarding his relations with the justice administration, arguing unequal treatment compared to other officials. The Court ruled that the absence of specific legal regulation in this context does not constitute a violation of constitutional equality or effective judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 14 CE: The absence of specific legal regulation in a non-harmful context does not violate the right to effective judicial protection or the principle of equality among public officials.

Keywords

AI generated
legislative gap effective judicial protection principle of equality public officials fundamental rights administrative relations constitutional appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 14 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2011-1994

Fecha de resolución

30/01/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.011/1994.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Vacío legislativo: omisión de regulación legal no lesiva de derechos fundamentales. Principio de igualdad: funcionarios. Contenido constitucional de la demanda:

carencia.

Don Celestino Salgado Carrero contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo del T.S.J. de Madrid recaída en recurso contra resoluciones de la Dirección General de Relaciones con la Administración de Justicia relativa a reclamación

administrativa.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00027-1994_02011.pdf