Constitutional Court denies suspension of execution of civil divorce judgment due to lack of procedural grounds.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court denied the suspension of execution for a civil divorce judgment originating from the Madrid Provincial Court. The applicant, Don Eduardo Trillo Torres, sought suspension of the act that initiated the amparo remedy, arguing procedural irregularities in the separation proceedings. The court ruled that the request for suspension was inadmissible because the underlying civil judgment was already final and the procedural requirements for suspending its execution were not met.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 149.1.18 CE; Art. 24 CE: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to suspend the execution of final civil judgments unless specific constitutional rights are directly and immediately affected, which was not established here.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sala Primera
Magistrados
Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra, don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende y don Pedro Cruz Villalón.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 2100-1993
Fecha de resolución
10/02/1995
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Denegando la suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el recurso de amparo 2.100/1993.
Resumen
Suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el amparo: Sentencia civil: improcedencia.
Don Eduardo Trillo Torres contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid recaída en apelación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 22 de la capital en autos de separación matrimonial.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00012-1993_02100.pdf