Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural irrelevance and lack of penal legality violation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Francisco Outeirino Mígues against a disciplinary sanction imposed on a judge. The appellant argued that procedural irregularities and the imposition of the sanction violated his rights, but the Court found these issues irrelevant to the core legal principles. Consequently, the Court ruled that the principle of penal legality was not violated and the constitutional content of the demand was lacking.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The principle of legal penal validity is not violated by procedural irregularities of minor relevance, and the effective protection of judges and courts does not extend to demands lacking constitutional substance.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don José Gabaldón López y don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1878-1994
Fecha de resolución
16/01/1995
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.878/1994.
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: irregularidades procesales irrelevantes. Principio de legalidad penal: no vulnerado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Francisco Outeirino Mígues contra Sentencia de la Sala de la Contencioso-Administrativo del T.S.J. de Galicia recaída en recurso contra Resolución de la Subsecretaría de Sanidad y consumo sobre imposición de sanción disciplinaria.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00009-1994_01878.pdf