Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 325/1994 ECLI:ES:TC:1994:325A AI generated

Spanish Constitutional Court denies suspension of execution for labor contract termination appeal.

Case Number AUTO 325/1994
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional denied the suspension of execution for the appeal against the termination of a labor contract. The applicant, Oriflame Cosméticos, S.A., sought to halt the judicial decision following a prior rejection of their request for suspension. The court ruled that the procedural requirements for suspending the execution of the act were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10.1 CE; Art. 44.1 CE: The Constitutional Court denies the suspension of execution of the act that gives rise to the appeal for protection of rights when the applicant fails to demonstrate the existence of a special circumstance justifying such suspension.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of execution labor contract termination recurso de amparo special circumstances procedural requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10.1 CE
Art. 44.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sala Primera

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra, don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende y don Pedro Cruz Villalón.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 314-1994

Fecha de resolución

28/11/1994

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Denegando la suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el recurso de amparo 314/1994

Resumen

Suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el amparo: resolución judicial: improcedencia.

«Oriflame Cosméticos, S.A.», contra Auto del T.S.J. de Madrid, que estima recurso de súplica contra otro anterior y desestima recurso de suplicación contra el dictado por el Juzgado de lo Social núm. 14 de Madrid, sobre extinción de contrato.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1994/1994_00325-1994_00314.pdf