Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 218/1994 ECLI:ES:TC:1994:218A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and failure to compare equal situations.

Case Number AUTO 218/1994
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Acabados Pirineos, S.A. against a Supreme Court ruling that rejected a cassation request regarding public domain water damage compensation. The Court found the lower court's decision lacked effective judicial protection because it failed to provide sufficient reasoning and did not compare the applicant's situation with others in an equal context. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as it did not meet the constitutional requirements for effective judicial remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1994: The right to effective judicial protection requires that judgments be sufficiently motivated and that equal situations be compared to ensure equality before the law.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection principle of equality sufficient motivation comparison of situations constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1994

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 3793-1993

Fecha de resolución

04/07/1994

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 3.793/1993

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia recurrida. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Acabados Pirineos, S. A.», contra Auto de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo que inadmite recurso de casación contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo del T.S.J. de Cataluña, sobre indemnización por daños ocasionados al dominio

público por vertido de aguas.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1994/1994_00218-1993_03793.pdf