Constitutional Court dismisses appeal after tenant withdraws, noting no constitutional violation occurred.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal admissible but granted the applicant's withdrawal, resulting in the dismissal of the case. The dispute involved a tenant challenging a Supreme Court decision that rejected a cassation appeal against a lease contract termination. Since the applicant voluntarily withdrew the constitutional complaint, the Court had no further jurisdiction to rule on the merits of the underlying property dispute.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: When a party withdraws a constitutional appeal, the Court dismisses the case without examining the substantive constitutional complaint, as the procedural requirement for continued litigation is no longer met.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Luis López Guerra, don José Gabaldón López y don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1682-1993
Fecha de resolución
20/06/1994
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando haber lugar al desistimiento del actor en el recurso de amparo 1.682/1993
Resumen
Desistimiento: procedencia.
«Fraga Espectáculos, S. A.», contra Auto de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo por el que se inadmite recurso de casación contra la Sentencia dictada por la Audiencia Provincial de Lugo dimanante de resolución de contrato de arrendamiento.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1994/1994_00205-1993_01682.pdf