Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 109/1994 ECLI:ES:TC:1994:109A AI generated

Constitutional Court denies suspension of civil judgment execution due to procedural impropriety in the original trial.

Case Number AUTO 109/1994
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court denied the suspension of execution for a civil judgment against Antonio Tiagonce Maderas, S.A. The applicant argued the original civil proceedings were improper, yet the court found no valid grounds to halt enforcement. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural defects did not justify suspending the lower court's decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 53.1 CE; Art. 24 CE: The Constitutional Court may deny suspension of execution when the applicant fails to demonstrate that the underlying civil judgment is fundamentally flawed or that suspension is necessary to prevent irreparable harm.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of execution recurso de amparo civil judgment procedural impropriety enforcement of decisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 53.1 CE
Art. 24 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sala Segunda

Magistrados

Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil, don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don José Gabaldón López, don Julio D. González Campos y don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 901-1993

Fecha de resolución

11/04/1994

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Denegando la suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el recurso de amparo 901/1993

Resumen

Suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el amparo: Sentencia civil: improcedencia.

«Antonio Tiagonce Maderas, S. A.», contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Lugo recaída en apelación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Becerreá en juicio de menor cuantía por reclamación de cantidad.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1994/1994_00109-1993_00901.pdf