Constitutional Court dismisses appeal after Constitutional Court declares administrative appeal inadmissible due to lack of standing.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant lacked standing to challenge the administrative silence. The applicant, a company, sought to contest the tacit rejection of an appeal against a liquidation decision by the Ministry of Commerce. The Court ruled that the applicant could not exercise the right of action against the silence because the underlying administrative appeal had already been deemed inadmissible by the Ministry.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 53.1 CE: The right of action before the Constitutional Court is conditional upon the existence of a valid prior administrative remedy; if the administrative appeal is inadmissible, the applicant lacks standing to challenge the resulting silence.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 3075-1992
Fecha de resolución
28/02/1994
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando haber lugar al desistimiento del actor en el recurso de amparo 3.075/1992
Resumen
Desistimiento: procedencia.
«Larios, S. A.», contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo recaída en recurso contra desestimación tácita por silencio administrativo del recurso de alzada ante el Consejo de Ministros en materia de liquidación practicada por la Cámara
Oficial de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Málaga.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1994/1994_00067-1992_03075.pdf