Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of equality between civil servants and private sector employees regarding access programs.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to demonstrate a violation of the principle of equality. The applicant argued that the administrative body's refusal to grant access to the Superior Civil Servants Corps discriminated against him compared to private sector employees. The court ruled that the distinction was justified by the specific nature of public service requirements and the applicant did not prove unequal treatment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 14 CE; Art. 24 CE: The principle of equality does not require identical treatment for all subjects when objective differences in the nature of the activity justify distinct regulatory approaches, provided no arbitrary discrimination exists.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1724-1993
Fecha de resolución
21/02/1994
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.724/1993
Resumen
Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: funcionarios. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don José Carlos Rodríguez López contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Nacional contra resolución que desestima recurso de reposición sobre ejercicio y programas para acceso al Cuerpo Superior de Administradores
Civiles del Estado.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1994/1994_00061-1993_01724.pdf