Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 312/1993 ECLI:ES:TC:1993:312A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to applicant's own fault and lack of constitutional content in the underlying claim.

Case Number AUTO 312/1993
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by 'Cooperativa Laboral Nuevo Horizonte' against a first-instance court's refusal to admit a reposición request. The applicant argued the lower court's decision violated constitutional rights, but the Court found the underlying urban lease claim lacked constitutional content. Consequently, the Court ruled the appeal was inadmissible because the failure to properly frame the constitutional issue was attributable to the applicant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 54 CE: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the underlying claim lacks constitutional content and the procedural defect is attributable to the applicant.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal inadmissibility lack of constitutional content procedural fault attributable urban lease law dispute recurso de amparo

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 54 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don José Gabaldón López y don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 754-1993

Fecha de resolución

25/10/1993

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 754/1993

Resumen

Inadmisión. Desistimiento: improcedencia. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Cooperativa Laboral Nuevo Horizonte» contra providencia del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 20 de Madrid, que inadmite recurso de reposición en ejecución de Sentencia recaída en autos incidentales de la Ley de Arrendamientos Urbanos.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00312-1993_00754.pdf