Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 229/1993 ECLI:ES:TC:1993:229A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of content and procedural defects in the social court judgment.

Case Number AUTO 229/1993
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, citing procedural flaws and a lack of constitutional content in the challenged social court ruling. The applicant argued that the judgment was not properly notified and violated the principle of contradiction, while the state contended the procedural timeline was valid. The court rejected these claims, finding the judgment legally sufficient and the appeal devoid of substantive constitutional issues.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The Constitutional Court established that an appeal is inadmissible if the challenged judgment lacks constitutional content and procedural defects do not justify a violation of the principle of contradiction.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Appeal Procedural Defects Principle of Contradiction Lack of Constitutional Content Social Court Judgment Notification Defects Inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 24.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2386-1992

Fecha de resolución

12/07/1993

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.386/1992

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: no caducidad de la acción. Principio de contradicción: no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Manuela Suárez Suárez contra providencia del Juzgado de lo Social núm. 2 de Oviedo que no fue notificada al recurrente y señala día para efectuar lanzamiento de vivienda.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00229-1992_02386.pdf