Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 134/1993 ECLI:ES:TC:1993:134A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of procedural exhaustion and absence of defense violation.

Case Number AUTO 134/1993
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust prior judicial remedies regarding the case file's archiving. The applicant argued that the archiving violated his right to a speedy process and defense rights, while the lower court maintained the procedural steps were correct. The court rejected these claims, ruling that the applicant did not demonstrate a violation of constitutional guarantees sufficient to warrant the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The right to a speedy process and defense is not violated when a case is archived following proper procedural steps without infringing upon the accused's rights.

Keywords

AI generated
right to speedy process procedural exhaustion defense rights violation case archiving constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 24.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2012-1991

Fecha de resolución

26/04/1993

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.012/1991

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a un proceso sin dilaciones: actuaciones archivadas. Derecho de defensa: no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Manuel Rosa Recuerda contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Sevilla en el recurso de queja contra el dictado de archivo por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 10 de Sevilla, en diligencias previas.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00134-1991_02012.pdf