Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of congruence between Supreme Court's ruling and the appealed judgment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Juan Ramio Serra against a Supreme Court order dismissing a cassation for unification of doctrine. The appellant argued that the Supreme Court's decision violated his right to use evidentiary means, while the lower court had already rejected such evidence. The Court ruled the appeal inadmissible because the Supreme Court's ruling was not congruent with the facts and legal reasoning of the original judgment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 CE; Art. 24.2 CE: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal when the Supreme Court's ruling lacks congruence with the appealed judgment, failing to address the constitutional complaint raised.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 2066-1992
Fecha de resolución
15/03/1993
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.066/1992
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Juan Ramio Serra contra Auto de la Sala de lo Social del Tribunal Supremo que declara la inadmisión del recurso de casación para la unificación de doctrina contra la dictada por la Sala Social del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña, sobre
derecho a utilizar medios de prueba.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00086-1992_02066.pdf