Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection regarding sentence notification.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to demonstrate a lack of effective judicial protection. The applicant argued that the notification of the final judgment violated his rights, but the court found the demand lacked constitutional merit. Consequently, the request for review of the notification procedure was rejected as it did not meet the threshold for constitutional review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when the notification of a final judgment follows the statutory procedure, as the applicant must demonstrate a specific defect in the judicial process itself.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Luis López Guerra, don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1889-1992
Fecha de resolución
29/01/1993
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.889/1992
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: notificación de Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Paulino Jardón González contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo, que confirma el dictado por la misma declarando la firmeza de la Sentencia recaída.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00040-1992_01889.pdf