Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to factual modification of charges.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the administrative court had modified the facts underlying the criminal charges. The petitioner argued this violated the principle of legality and effective judicial protection, while the state contended the modification was procedural. The court ruled that since the original criminal conduct was not typified by the law at the time, the subsequent administrative modification did not constitute an effective remedy for the alleged constitutional violation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 139.1 CE: The principle of legality in criminal law precludes the effective judicial protection of a defendant when the conduct is not typified by the law at the time of the act, even if administrative proceedings subsequently modify the imputed facts.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Luis López Guerra, don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1591-1992
Fecha de resolución
29/01/1993
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.591/1992
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: modificación de los hechos imputados. Principio de legalidad penal: conducta tipificada. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Pedro Salvador Oliver Frontera contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de las Islas Baleares, en recurso sobre infracción administrativa de la Ley 16/1985.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00037-1992_01591.pdf