Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of standing for parents regarding children's religious education.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the parents lacked standing to challenge the expulsion order. The applicants argued that their right to choose their children's moral and religious formation was violated by the removal of their son from Spain. The court rejected this claim because only the child, not the parents, holds the direct interest in their own religious education.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 14 CE: The right to effective judicial protection and equality before the law do not grant parents standing to challenge administrative expulsion orders based on the child's religious education, as the child is the sole holder of that right.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Luis López Guerra, don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1394-1992
Fecha de resolución
29/01/1993
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.394/1992
Resumen
Inadmisión. Derecho a la intimidad personal y familiar: no violado. Derecho de los padres a elegir la formación moral y religiosa de los hijos: falta de legitimación. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: expulsión de extranjeros.
Don Teodoro Dunkley Navarro contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo, que confirma la dictada por la Audiencia Territorial de Palma de Mallorca, sobre expulsión del territorio nacional.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00036-1992_01394.pdf