Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of legal standing regarding judges' effective protection.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal for protection filed by Don Fernando Gómez Ortega against a Social Court judgment. The applicant argued for the effective judicial protection of judges, but the court found the claim lacked the necessary constitutional content. Consequently, the remedy was rejected because the demand failed to meet the strict requirements for admissibility under the Constitution.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 24 CE: The right to effective judicial protection is not applicable when the claim lacks the necessary constitutional content or legal standing.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 918-1992
Fecha de resolución
14/12/1992
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 918/1992
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Fernando Gómez Ortega contra Sentencia de la Sala Social de Madrid.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00382-1992_00918.pdf