Constitutional Court dismisses appeal as Supreme Court already satisfied the claim via extrajudicial means.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Salvador Palop Martínez against a Supreme Court ruling. The Supreme Court had already addressed the applicant's grievances through a special procedure, finding relevant evidence and dismissing the request for a new trial. Consequently, the Court determined that no constitutional violation remained to be examined since the substantive claim was extrajudicially satisfied.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 CE; Art. 24.2 CE: When a judicial body has already provided extrajudicial satisfaction for the claim, the Constitutional Court must declare the appeal inadmissible as there is no remaining constitutional violation to examine.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1779-1991
Fecha de resolución
01/12/1992
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.779/1991
Resumen
Inadmisión. Satisfacción extraprocesal de la pretensión.
Don Salvador Palop Martínez contra Auto de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo en procedimiento especial 610/90, declarando no haber lugar al recurso de súplica contra el dictado por la misma Sala declarándose pertinentes todas las pruebas propuestas.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00367-1991_01779.pdf