Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for satisfaction of extrajudicial remedy under Art. 24.1 and 2 C.E.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Salvador Palop Martínez against the Supreme Court's decision to open an oral trial. The applicant sought a suspension of proceedings based on Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution, arguing for extrajudicial satisfaction of his claims. The Court rejected the request because the matter was already being addressed through an extrajudicial remedy, rendering the constitutional appeal unnecessary.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 y 2 C.E.: When a claim is satisfiable through an extrajudicial remedy, the Constitutional Court must declare the appeal inadmissible to avoid procedural redundancy.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 197-1991
Fecha de resolución
01/12/1992
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 197/1991
Resumen
Inadmisión. Satisfacción extraprocesal de la pretensión.
Don Salvador Palop Martínez contra Auto del Magistrado-Instructor de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, por el que se acuerda la apertura de juicio oral. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E. Solicita suspensión.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00365-1991_00197.pdf