Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 270/1992 ECLI:ES:TC:1992:270A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to rhetorical invocation and lack of comparison.

Case Number AUTO 270/1992
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Don Tomás Guerrero Guillén against a Barcelona court's decision on a lease contract. The applicant invoked the effective judicial protection of judges and tribunals, but the Court found the argument merely rhetorical and lacking a proper basis for comparison under the principle of equality. Consequently, the Court rejected the claim because the constitutional demand failed to meet the required substantive criteria for admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1994: The effective judicial protection of judges and tribunals is not granted when the invocation is purely rhetorical or lacks a valid basis for comparison, rendering the constitutional demand inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection rhetorical invocation principle of equality constitutional demand inadmissibility lease contract dispute Tribunal Constitucional

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1994

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don José Gabaldón López y don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 932-1992

Fecha de resolución

14/09/1992

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 932/1992

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: invocación retórica. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Tomás Guerrero Guillén contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona, en recurso de apelación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 29 de Barcelona, sobre resolución de contrato de arrendamiento por cesión

inconsentida.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00270-1992_00932.pdf