Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 267/1992 ECLI:ES:TC:1992:267A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of congruence and reformatio in peius concerns.

Case Number AUTO 267/1992
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, citing a lack of congruence between the contested judgment and the constitutional rights invoked. The applicant argued for effective judicial protection, but the Court found the lower court's decision on the collective labor conflict did not violate these rights. Consequently, the Court ruled that no constitutional error existed to warrant the appeal's admission.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24 CE: The Constitutional Court holds that an appeal is inadmissible when the contested judgment does not violate the right to effective judicial protection and when the principle of reformatio in peius precludes a worsening of the applicant's position.

Keywords

AI generated
recurso de amparo tutela efectiva congruencia sentencial reformatio in peius conflicto colectivo inadmisión a trámite derecho laboral

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don José Gabaldón López y don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 618-1992

Fecha de resolución

14/09/1992

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 618/1992

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. «Reformatio in peius»: inexistencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Empresa Nacional de Electrónica y Sistemas, S. A.», contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Social del T.S.J. de Madrid, en recurso de suplicación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de lo Social núm. 21 de Madrid, sobre conflicto colectivo.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00267-1992_00618.pdf