Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 265/1992 ECLI:ES:TC:1992:265A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal remedy due to lack of effective judicial protection and insufficient sentence motivation.

Case Number AUTO 265/1992
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal remedy filed by Don José Palazón Gomariz against a provincial court auto. The applicant argued that the denial of evidence and lack of detailed reasoning in the lower court's decision violated his fundamental rights. The Court ruled that the absence of a reasoned judgment does not constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24 CE: The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when a court decision lacks detailed motivation, provided the decision itself is not arbitrary or contrary to law.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection lack of motivation appeal remedy inadmissibility fundamental rights violation procedural due process

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 486-1992

Fecha de resolución

14/09/1992

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 486/1992

Resumen

Inadmisión. Prueba: su denegación no constituye violación de derecho fundamental. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Palazón Gomariz contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Murcia, en recurso de apelación contra el dictado por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 3 de Molina de Segura, por un posible delito de daños y otro contra la salud pública.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00265-1992_00486.pdf