Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 262/1992 ECLI:ES:TC:1992:262A AI generated

Spanish Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and insufficient sentence motivation.

Case Number AUTO 262/1992
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the effective judicial protection of judges and courts was not met. The applicant, Chanel S.A., argued the lower court's dismissal of proceedings lacked sufficient constitutional motivation in its judgment. The court held that without adequate reasoning in the appealed sentence, the fundamental right to a reasoned judicial decision was violated, rendering the appeal procedurally inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.: The effective judicial protection of judges and courts requires that the appealed sentence be sufficiently motivated to allow for a meaningful review of the legal and factual grounds.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection judges and courts sentence motivation constitutional demand procedural inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don José Gabaldón López y don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2620-1991

Fecha de resolución

14/09/1992

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.620/1991

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Chanel, S. A.», contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona, que desestima el recurso de apelación contra el Auto dictado por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 9 de Barcelona, de sobreseimiento en diligencias previas.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00262-1991_02620.pdf