Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against disciplinary warning for lawyer's procedural delay in amparo case.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by a lawyer against a disciplinary warning issued for his conduct in an amparo proceeding. The lawyer argued that the sanction violated his right to a fair trial due to procedural delays, while the opposing party contended the delay constituted a breach of professional duties. The court ruled that the disciplinary measure was justified and did not infringe upon the constitutional rights claimed.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Art. 54 C.E.: The Constitutional Court may impose disciplinary sanctions on lawyers for procedural misconduct in amparo proceedings without violating the right to a fair trial.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1974-1990
Fecha de resolución
23/03/1992
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando imponer sanción disciplinaria de apercibimiento al Letrado que intervino en el recurso de amparo 1.974/1990
Resumen
Condenación de multa impuesta previamente. Ahogado: sanción de apercibimiento.
Don Juan García-Celay Rodríguez contra Sentencia del Juzgado de lo Penal núm. 26 de Madrid, sobre supuesto delito contra la seguridad del tráfico. Art. 24 C.E. Solicita justicia gratuita.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00082-1990-01974.pdf