Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 75/1992 ECLI:ES:TC:1992:75A AI generated

Constitutional Court denies suspension of execution of criminal order for telephone interception in Spain.

Case Number AUTO 75/1992
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court denied the request to suspend the execution of a criminal order authorizing telephone interception. The applicant, Don Antonio Mouriño Viñas, challenged the measures taken by the Bilbao Judicial Investigation Court and the Provincial Court. The Court ruled that the suspension was improper given the specific procedural context of the criminal investigation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 CE; Art. 25.1 CE: The Constitutional Court holds that the suspension of execution of a judicial order for telephone interception is not procedurally admissible in this context.

Keywords

AI generated
telephone interception suspension of execution criminal investigation judicial order constitutional amparo procedural admissibility telecommunications surveillance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 CE
Art. 25.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sala Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 625-1991

Fecha de resolución

16/03/1992

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Denegando la suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el recurso de amparo 625/1991

Resumen

Suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el amparo: Sentencia penal: improcedencia.

Don Antonio Mouriño Viñas contra Autos del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 5 de Bilbao, en diligencias indeterminadas que acuerdan la intervención telefónica y la prórroga de la misma y Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de dicha ciudad, que ratifican las

anteriores medidas.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00075-1991_00625.pdf