Constitutional court dismisses appeal against criminal conviction for injuries causing death, upholding final judgment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by the applicant against the Supreme Court's conviction for injuries resulting in death. The applicant sought suspension of the execution of the sentence based on Article 25.1 of the Constitution, arguing for a review of the penalty. The court declined to intervene, affirming that the final criminal judgment remains binding and that the appeal lacked merit.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 25.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: The Constitutional Court does not review the substantive correctness of final criminal judgments or suspend their execution unless specific constitutional violations are proven, thereby upholding the principle of legal certainty in criminal proceedings.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Segunda
Magistrados
Don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 2840-1990
Fecha de resolución
13/02/1992
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando haber lugar al desistimiento del actor en el recurso de amparo 2.840/1990, promovido en causa penal.
Síntesis Analítica
Desistimiento: procedencia.
Resumen
Recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, en recurso de casación contra la dictada por la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, por delitos de lesiones, coacciones e imprudencia con resultado de muerte. Art. 25.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.
containers
Visualización
containers