Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 328/1991 ECLI:ES:TC:1991:328A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal as judicial review of norms is not its function.

Case Number AUTO 328/1991
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the Constitutional Court does not serve as a vehicle for the control of norms. The applicant, Alejandro Pastrana Riol, sought protection against a social court judgment regarding necessary co-litigation and prescription, arguing a constitutional violation. The court rejected this because the effective remedy for norm review lies with the judges and tribunals themselves, not the Constitutional Court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 41.1 CE: The Constitutional Court is not the proper channel for the control of norms; the effective protection of rights requires recourse to the ordinary judges and tribunals.

Keywords

AI generated
control of norms effective judicial protection constitutional court jurisdiction judicial review limits remedy exhaustion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 41.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 622-1991

Fecha de resolución

28/10/1991

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 622/1991

Resumen

Inadmisión. Recurso de amparo: no es vía para el control de normas. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de suplicación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Alejandro Pastrana Riol contra Sentencia del Juzgado de lo Social núm. 13 de Madrid, que desestima las excepciones de falta de litisconsorcio pasivo necesario y de prescripción de la acción alegadas, sobre reclamación de derechos.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00328-1991_00622.pdf