Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for ineffective vacation order, citing lack of effective judicial protection due to labor court rejection.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the amparo remedy filed by Juan Manuel Corrales López against a labor court judgment dismissing his claim regarding an ineffective unilateral vacation order. The applicant argued that the labor court's decision violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found no constitutional defect in the labor court's ruling. Consequently, the Court held that the amparo was inadmissible because the labor court had already provided the necessary judicial remedy, rendering the constitutional complaint unnecessary.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The amparo remedy is inadmissible when the ordinary courts have already provided the effective judicial protection required by the Constitution, as the applicant failed to demonstrate a violation of constitutional rights by the labor court's decision.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 467-1991
Fecha de resolución
16/09/1991
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 467/1991
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de demanda laboral. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Juan Manuel Corrales López contra Sentencia del Juzgado de lo Social núm. 1 de Salamanca que desestima demanda contra la Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Salamanca, sobre ineficacia de orden unilateral de vacaciones. Art. 24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00261-1991_00467.pdf