Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 260/1991 ECLI:ES:TC:1991:260A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of comparison term violating equality principle.

Case Number AUTO 260/1991
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the amparo appeal filed by José María Maldonado Nausia against a Supreme Court ruling denying radio license concessions. The applicant argued violations of equality, freedom of expression, and due process under Articles 14, 16.1, and 20.1 of the Constitution. The Court rejected these claims because the challenged administrative decision lacked a comparative term, rendering the alleged inequality argument legally unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 16.1 C.E.; Art. 20.1 C.E.: The principle of equality requires a comparative term to establish inequality; without such a term, the constitutional complaint lacks content and is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
Principle of Equality Comparative Term Requirement Constitutional Complaint Radio License Concessions Inadmissible Procedural Defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
Arts. 14, 16.1 y 20.1 C.E.
Art. 16.1 C.E.
Art. 20.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 395-1991

Fecha de resolución

16/09/1991

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 395/1991

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José María Maldonado Nausia contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo que desestima recurso de apelación contra la dictada por la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Nacional, sobre concesiones de emisoras de

radiodifusión en onda media. Arts. 14, 16.1 y 20.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00260-1991_00395.pdf