Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 254/1991 ECLI:ES:TC:1991:254A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal claiming unequal treatment of different normative situations regarding nullity of arbitration awards.

Case Number AUTO 254/1991
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Doña Purificación Hernández Rex and others against a Supreme Court ruling that rejected a nullity claim against a notarized arbitration award. The applicants argued that the Supreme Court's refusal violated the principle of equality by treating distinct normative situations differently under Articles 14 and 24 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this contention, ruling that the Supreme Court correctly applied the law without infringing constitutional guarantees of equality or effective judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The principle of equality does not require identical treatment of legally distinct normative situations, and the Supreme Court's application of procedural rules regarding arbitration award nullity did not violate constitutional rights.

Keywords

AI generated
principle of equality arbitration award nullity constitutional appeal inadmissibility distinct normative situations effective judicial protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
Doña Purificación Hernández Rex y otros contra Sentencia de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo que declara no haber lugar al recurso de nulidad contra el laudo protocolizado en escritura pública. Arts. 14 y 24 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo y don José Gabaldón López.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 91-1991

Fecha de resolución

11/09/1991

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 91/1991

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: tratamiento diferenciado de situaciones normativas distintas. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Purificación Hernández Rex y otros contra Sentencia de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo que declara no haber lugar al recurso de nulidad contra el laudo protocolizado en escritura pública. Arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00254-1991_00091.pdf