Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 236/1991 ECLI:ES:TC:1991:236A AI generated

Constitutional Court suspends execution of Supreme Court labor judgment pending conditional admissibility of amparo appeal.

Case Number AUTO 236/1991
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court suspended the execution of the Supreme Court's labor judgment while the amparo appeal remains conditionally admissible. Rumasa S.A. challenged a lower court's monetary award via cassation, which was dismissed, prompting this constitutional review. The court halted enforcement to allow the amparo procedure to proceed, balancing finality with constitutional protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 15.1 CE; Art. 24 CE: The Constitutional Court may suspend the execution of a judicial act when the admissibility of an amparo appeal is conditionally admitted, ensuring constitutional rights are not prejudiced before final review.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Court suspension of execution amparo appeal labor dispute conditional admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 15.1 CE
Art. 24 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección de Vacaciones

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1306-1991

Fecha de resolución

13/08/1991

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la suspensión condicionada de la ejecución del acto que origina el recurso de amparo 1.306/1991

Resumen

Suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el amparo: Sentencia laboral: procedencia condicionada.

Rumasa, S. A., contra Sentencia de la Sala Cuarta del Tribunal Supremo desestimando recurso de casación, contra la dictada por el Juzgado Social núm. 20 de Madrid, sobre reclamación de cantidad.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00236-1991_01306.pdf