Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 186/1991 ECLI:ES:TC:1991:186A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to applicant's indefensibility and lack of relevant evidence rights.

Case Number AUTO 186/1991
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal filed by PTM Ingenieria S.A. against a lower court's dismissal of a monetary claim. The applicant argued for the right to use pertinent evidence and the presumption of innocence, but the court found the indefensibility attributable to the appellant and the demand lacked constitutional content. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the applicant failed to demonstrate a violation of their rights under Article 24.1.2 of the Constitution.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1.2 C.E.; The right to use pertinent evidence does not extend to situations where the indefensibility is attributable to the appellant, and the demand lacks constitutional content.

Keywords

AI generated
right to evidence presumption of innocence indefensibility attributable constitutional demand content Article 24.1.2 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 116-1991

Fecha de resolución

17/06/1991

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 116/1991

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a utilizar los medios de prueba pertinentes: contenido. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: relación contractual. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

PTM INGENIERIA, S. A., contra Sentencia de la Sección Decimosexta de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona que desestima el recurso de apelación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 1 de Granollers, sobre reclamación de cantidad.

Art. 24.1.2. C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00186-1991_00116.pdf