Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial remedy regarding enforcement of a Supreme Court judgment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by María del Carmen Bengoechea Martín against the Supreme Court's refusal to enforce a prior judgment. The applicant argued that the effective judicial remedy was violated because the Supreme Court declared the execution of the sentence fulfilled without addressing the underlying dispute. The Court ruled that the specific procedural posture of the Supreme Court's decision did not constitute a denial of the right to effective judicial protection under the Constitution.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when a Supreme Court declares the execution of a sentence fulfilled in a specific procedural context, provided the applicant has exhausted available remedies.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo y don José Gabaldón López.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 603-1990
Fecha de resolución
11/02/1991
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 603/1990
Resumen
Inadmisión. Derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva: ejecución de Sentencia.
Dona María del Carmen Bengoechea Martín y otros contra Auto de la Sección Tercera del Tribunal Supremo que desestima el recurso de súplica contra resolución que declara cumplido lo ordenado en Sentencia recaída en recurso previo. Arts. 14 y 24 C.E
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00044-1990_00603.pdf