Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding effective judicial protection in execution of administrative court judgment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Angel de Miguel Navares against the Supreme Court's decision to dismiss a request for execution of a prior judgment. The applicant argued that the failure to enforce the administrative court's ruling violated his right to effective judicial protection under Articles 14 and 24 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim, ruling that the procedural history and the Supreme Court's reasoning did not constitute a violation of constitutional rights requiring constitutional review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 14 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The Constitutional Court does not admit appeals when the lower court's decision on the execution of a judgment does not manifestly violate the right to effective judicial protection.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo y don José Gabaldón López.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 579-1990
Fecha de resolución
11/02/1991
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 579/1990
Resumen
Inadmisión. Derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva: ejecución de Sentencia.
Don Angel de Miguel Navares y otros contra Auto de la Sección Tercera de lo Contencioso-Administrativo del Tribunal Supremo, que desestima el recurso de súplica contra resolución que declara cumplido lo ordenado en Sentencia recaída en el recurso previo.
Arts. 14 y 24 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00043-1990_00579.pdf