Constitutional court dismisses insurance company's appeal against court order to deduct fines from mandatory insurance.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a district court order to deduct fines from mandatory insurance premiums. The company argued this violated its right to a trial within a reasonable time under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court ruled that the deduction was a lawful administrative measure to ensure penalty payment and did not infringe constitutional rights.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; The deduction of court-imposed fines from mandatory insurance premiums does not violate the right to a trial within a reasonable time when the underlying judgment is final and the procedure is lawful.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 551-1988
Fecha de resolución
14/01/1991
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando haber lugar al desistimiento del actor en el recurso de amparo 551/1988
Resumen
Desistimiento: procedencia.
«Adriática, Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros», interpone recurso de amparo contra requerimiento efectuado por el Juzgado de Distrito núm. 4 de Madrid para abono, con cargo al seguro obligatorio, de indemnizaciones acordadas en Sentencia de juicio
de faltas. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers