Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 400/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:400A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to rhetorical invocation without substantive legal argument.

Case Number AUTO 400/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible for lack of procedural standing and substantive merit. The applicant, Dimas González Arranz, challenged a social court decision regarding pension benefits by invoking Articles 14 and 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found the arguments were merely rhetorical and lacked concrete legal content. Consequently, the court ruled that the invocation of effective judicial protection was insufficient to warrant further review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 24.1 C.E.: The invocation of effective judicial protection and equality before the law must be substantiated with concrete legal arguments; mere rhetorical references without specific legal grounds do not constitute a valid constitutional appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection rhetorical invocation equality before law substantive legal argument constitutional appeal inadmissibility procedural standing social court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
Art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1360-1990

Fecha de resolución

12/11/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.360/1990

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: invocación retórica. Principio de igualdad: igualdad en la aplicación de la Ley. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Dimas González Arranz contra Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco, que desestima el recurso de suplicación, contra la dictada por el Juzgado de lo Social núm. 1 de Vizcaya, sobre pensión de jubilación.

Arts. 14 y 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00400-1990_01360.pdf