Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for effective judicial protection due to inadmissible evidence and lack of sentence motivation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for effective judicial protection filed by Don José Bruguera Llora against a Barcelona Provincial Court judgment. The applicant argued for free legal aid and challenged the trial court's refusal to admit specific evidence and the insufficient reasoning in the appealed sentence. The Court rejected the appeal because the evidence was inadmissible and the lower court failed to provide adequate motivation for its decision.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Art. 54.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal for effective judicial protection inadmissible when the challenged judgment relies on inadmissible evidence or lacks the required motivation.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 2184-1989
Fecha de resolución
22/10/1990
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.184/1989
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de prueba; motivación de la Sentencia recurrida.
Don José Bruguera Llora contra resolución de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona, dictada en recurso de apelación. Art. 24 C.E. Solicita justicia gratuita.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00372-1989_02184.pdf