Constitutional court dismisses appeal against revocation of provisional liberty due to lack of constitutional content.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Angel Montes Martínez against the Audiencia Provincial of Granada's revocation of his provisional liberty. Montes argued that the administrative decision violated his right to personal freedom under Article 17.1 of the Constitution, but the court found no constitutional issue. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the contested resolution lacked the necessary constitutional dimension to warrant judicial review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17.1 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: An administrative act revoking provisional liberty is inadmissible as a constitutional appeal if it does not contain a specific violation of the constitutional right to personal freedom.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1009-1989
Fecha de resolución
17/09/1990
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.009/1989
Resumen
Inadmisión. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Angel Montes Martínez contra resolución de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia provincial de Granada que revoca su libertad provisional. Art. 17.1, C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00324-1989_01009.pdf