Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 274/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:274A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal remedy due to loss of legal object after final judgment in lease dispute.

Case Number AUTO 274/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal remedy filed by Don Manuel Sánchez Maldonado against a first-instance court ruling. The applicant argued that no procedural channel existed to appeal the judgment confirming a lease contract, invoking Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim because the underlying judgment had already become final, rendering the appeal remedy devoid of any legal object.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; When a judgment becomes final and no procedural channel for appeal exists, the appeal remedy loses its legal object and must be declared inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
loss of legal object final judgment appeal remedy procedural channel Article 24.1 Constitution lease contract dispute inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 957-1990

Fecha de resolución

02/07/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 957/1990

Resumen

Inadmisión. Demanda de amparo: pérdida de objeto.

Don Manuel Sánchez Maldonado contra Resoluciones del Juzgado de Primera Instancia 37 de Madrid, que declaran no haber cauce procesal para el recurso de apelación contra Auto de dicho Juzgado, por el que se declara firme la Sentencia, dictada en

procedimiento sobre contrato de arrendamiento. Art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00274-1990_00957.pdf