Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 254/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:254A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to lack of legal merit in the underlying social dismissal case.

Case Number AUTO 254/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Juan Cárceles Nieto against the denial of a social appeal. The applicant argued that the lower court's refusal violated his right to effective judicial protection under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim because the underlying social dismissal proceedings lacked the necessary legal merit to warrant constitutional intervention.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.; The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine the merits of a social dismissal case when the lower court has already denied the appeal for lack of legal merit, thereby exhausting ordinary judicial remedies.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection social dismissal proceedings lack of legal merit exhaustion of remedies Constitutional Court jurisdiction appeal for protection of rights Article 24 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
despido. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
despido. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2204-1989

Fecha de resolución

18/06/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.204/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de suplicación; cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Juan Cárceles Nieto y otros contra Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia, que deniega la admisión a trámite del recurso de suplicación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de los Social núm. 4 de dicha ciudad, en procedimiento sobre

despido. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00254-1989_02204.pdf