Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 253/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:253A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to lack of legal standing in labor dismissal case.

Case Number AUTO 253/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Don Antonio Santiago Santiago against a labor dismissal judgment. The applicant argued that the denial of admission to the appeal process violated his right to effective judicial protection under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim because the applicant lacked the necessary legal standing to challenge the procedural decision at that stage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to challenges by individuals lacking legal standing against procedural decisions in labor disputes.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection legal standing labor dismissal procedural denial constitutional appeal Tribunal Constitucional inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
despido. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
despido. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2163-1989

Fecha de resolución

18/06/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.163/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de suplicación; cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antonio Santiago Santiago contra Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia, que deniega las admisión a trámite del recurso de suplicación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de los Social núm. 4 de dicha ciudad, en procedimiento sobre

despido. Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00253-1989_02163.pdf