Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 249/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:249A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to lack of legal merit in the underlying social dismissal case.

Case Number AUTO 249/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Juan Manuel Segura Aracil against a social court ruling denying a dismissal appeal. The applicant argued that the lower court's refusal violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim because the underlying demand lacked legal merit and the procedural outcome was not arbitrary.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to cases where the underlying demand lacks legal merit or where the procedural outcome is not arbitrary.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection social dismissal appeal lack of legal merit constitutional appeal inadmissibility procedural arbitrariness

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2097-1989

Fecha de resolución

18/06/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.097/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de suplicación; cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Juan Manuel Segura Aracil contra Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia, que deniega la admisión a trámite del recurso de suplicación contra la dictada por el Juzgado de lo Social núm. 4 de dicha ciudad, en procedimiento sobre despido.

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00249-1989_02097.pdf