Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 248/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:248A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for effective judicial protection due to lack of legal interest in the underlying claim.

Case Number AUTO 248/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Doña Antonia García Giner against the Supreme Court's dismissal of her request for a monetary amount. The applicant argued that the refusal violated her right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found no legal interest in the demand. Consequently, the Court ruled that without a valid legal basis for the claim, the constitutional remedy could not be entertained.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to claims lacking legal interest or merit, rendering the constitutional appeal inadmissible when the underlying demand is legally unfounded.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection legal interest in demand inadmissibility of appeal Article 24.1 Constitution lack of merit claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Doña Antonia García Giner contra Auto del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia que declara inadmisible el recurso de suplicación interpuesto contra Sentencia del Juzgado de los Social de dicha capital, sobre reclamación de cantidad. Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2096-1989

Fecha de resolución

18/06/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.096/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de suplicación; cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Antonia García Giner contra Auto del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia que declara inadmisible el recurso de suplicación interpuesto contra Sentencia del Juzgado de los Social de dicha capital, sobre reclamación de cantidad. Art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00248-1989_02096.pdf