Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 229/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:229A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of congruence between judgment and constitutional demand.

Case Number AUTO 229/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to a lack of congruence between the contested judgment and the constitutional claim. The applicant requested free legal aid while challenging a sentence, but the court found the demand did not align with the specific constitutional protection sought. Consequently, the procedural requirement for a coherent constitutional complaint was not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 44 CE: A constitutional appeal is inadmissible if the demand lacks congruence with the contested judgment, requiring the applicant to precisely identify the specific constitutional violation addressed by the decision.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal lack of congruence free legal aid procedural inadmissibility effective judicial protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Don Antonio Quiles Rey contra Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid. Art. 24. Solicita justicia gratuita.
Art. 44 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 39-1990

Fecha de resolución

04/06/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 39/1990

Resumen

Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antonio Quiles Rey contra Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid. Art. 24. Solicita justicia gratuita.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00229-1990_00039.pdf