Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for free legal aid due to lack of poverty proof and procedural defects.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal for free legal aid inadmissible, citing the applicant's failure to provide sufficient evidence of poverty. The applicant, a lawyer and notary, requested free representation for an eviction case but lacked the required financial documentation. The court ruled that without proof of indigence, the statutory conditions for granting free legal aid were not met.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 119.1 CE; Art. 119.2 CE: The Constitutional Court must dismiss an appeal for free legal aid when the applicant fails to substantiate their claim of poverty or when procedural requirements are not fulfilled.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Segunda
Magistrados
Don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 333-1990
Fecha de resolución
21/05/1990
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando tener por excusado al Letrado en el recurso de amparo 333/1990
Resumen
Abogado y Procurador de oficio:excusa.
Don Joaquín Herrero de la Hoz contra providencia del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 18 de Madrid, sobre lanzamiento de vivienda. Solicita justicia gratuita.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00216-1990_00333.pdf