Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 211/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:211A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding effective judicial protection and nullity of summary proceedings diligence.

Case Number AUTO 211/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. González Serrano against the Audiencia Provincial's refusal to decline jurisdiction. The appellant argued that the summary proceedings diligence violated his rights under Articles 24.1 and 17.3 of the Constitution, while the state contended the lower court had proper jurisdiction. The Court rejected the claim, ruling that the procedural defect did not constitute a violation of the effective judicial protection guaranteed by the Constitution.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 y 17.3 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection does not encompass a general right to challenge the jurisdiction of summary proceedings diligence absent a specific constitutional violation.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection summary proceedings diligence jurisdictional competence constitutional appeal inadmissibility nullity of procedural acts

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Instrucción núm. 4. Arts. 24.1 y 17.3 C.E. Solicita la suspensión.
Art. 17.3 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1679-1988

Fecha de resolución

18/05/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.679/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: nulidad de diligencias sumariales. Imputado: concepto. Juez instructor: reconocimiento de la condición de imputado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Ignacio González Serrano interpone recurso de amparo contra Autos de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid que acuerdan no haber lugar a la declinatoria de la jurisdicción y reconoce su competencia para fallar causa procedente del Juzgado de

Instrucción núm. 4. Arts. 24.1 y 17.3 C.E. Solicita la suspensión.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00211-1988_01679.pdf